Delhi High Court Examines If IndiaMART Is Liable for Trademark Infringement ๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ | SecureMyTM Blog Image

Delhi High Court Examines If IndiaMART Is Liable for Trademark Infringement ๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ

๐Ÿ—“ 18-06-2025 11:17 AM | โœ๏ธ Admin | SMT
๐Ÿ“˜ Introduction
Is IndiaMART merely a business directory โ€” or does it act as an active marketplace with legal responsibility for trademark infringement?
The Delhi High Court is examining this critical question in a recent case that may redefine how online platforms are treated under trademark law.

๐Ÿ” Background of the Case:
- Multiple trademark owners have accused IndiaMART of listing and promoting infringing product listings without consent.

- Plaintiffs argue that the platform hosts fake suppliers, unlicensed sellers, and even facilitates contact and enquiry forms โ€” creating confusion and damage to brand owners.

IndiaMART claims it is a neutral platform, only displaying information uploaded by users, akin to a digital directory.

โš–๏ธ Legal Issues Before the Court:
- Is IndiaMART a passive directory or an active marketplace?
Can intermediaries be held liable for third-party trademark infringement?
- Does hosting contact/lead generation tools create indirect endorsement or enablement of infringement?

๐Ÿ“š Legal Context:
- Under Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000, intermediaries enjoy protection only if they are passive conduits.

- However, if a platform participates in content promotion, monetization, or order facilitation, it can lose safe harbor protection.

- Previous Delhi HC cases (Kent RO v. Snapdeal, Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj) have ruled online sellers and service providers can be liable if theyโ€™re not truly passive.

๐Ÿง  Why This Case Matters
IndiaMART is Indiaโ€™s largest B2B listing platform. A ruling against it could trigger compliance changes across many similar models.

This case tests whether marketplace-model sites must start verifying sellers, IP rights, and product listings before publication.

๐Ÿงพ Likely Court Directions (As Per Past Rulings)
Platforms may need to:
โœ… Display trademark disclaimers on product pages
โœ… Provide a robust IP takedown mechanism
โœ… Disable listings upon verified brand complaints
โœ… Avoid promoting infringing content in search or lead funnels

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Trademark Holderโ€™s Advice:
โœ”๏ธ Register your trademarks (Wordmark + Logo)
โœ”๏ธ Send cease & desist notices to listing platforms
โœ”๏ธ Use court-approved formats for takedown notices
โœ”๏ธ Demand seller-level details and platform accountability

๐Ÿ“ฒ Need Help Protecting Your Brand Online?
SecureMyTM.com helps brands:
โœ”๏ธ Register and enforce trademarks
โœ”๏ธ File IP takedown requests to platforms
โœ”๏ธ Prepare legal notices & affidavits
โœ”๏ธ File online infringement cases in appropriate jurisdiction

๐Ÿ“ž Contact:
๐ŸŒ Website: www.SecureMyTM.com
๐Ÿ“ฉ Email: info@securemytm.com


๐Ÿ“Œ Disclaimer:
This blog summarizes ongoing legal matters for public awareness. For legal advice tailored to your trademark or digital rights, contact our expert team at SecureMyTM.com.

Tags: IndiaMART trademark infringement 2025, Delhi HC intermediary liability, online directory vs marketplace, IndiaMART legal case 2025, B2B platform IP infringement, safe harbor trademark India, platform seller verification

๐Ÿ“ข Share:
๐Ÿ“ฑ WhatsApp โœˆ๏ธ Telegram ๐Ÿ“ง Email ๐Ÿ–จ๏ธ Print ๐Ÿ“‹ Copy Link

๐Ÿ“ฐ More Blogs You May Like

Bombay High Court Rejects TikTokโ€™s Request for โ€œWell-Knownโ€ Trademark Status Citing National Ban

Bombay High Court Rejects TikTokโ€™s Request for โ€œWell-Knownโ€ Trademark Status Citing National Ban

In a significant decision shaping the future of digital brand protection in India, the Bom...

Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay โ‚น336 Crore for Trademark Infringement โ€” A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Platforms in India

Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay โ‚น336 Crore for Trademark Infringement โ€” A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Platforms in India

In a landmark judgment dated February 25, 2025, the Delhi High Court has held Amazon Techn...

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to โ€˜Parachuteโ€™ Over Packaging Imitation โ€“ Trademark Infringement Confirmed ๐Ÿงดโš–๏ธ

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to โ€˜Parachuteโ€™ Over Packaging Imitation โ€“ Trademark Infringement Confirmed ๐Ÿงดโš–๏ธ

๐Ÿ“˜ Introduction: On June 25, 2025, the Bombay High Court delivered a strong verdict protec...

Delhi High Court Holds Even Momentary Confusion Is Trademark Infringement (Under Armour vs Aero Armour)

Delhi High Court Holds Even Momentary Confusion Is Trademark Infringement (Under Armour vs Aero Armour)

๐Ÿ“˜ Introduction: In a significant ruling on May 23, 2025, the Delhi High Court clarified t...

Supreme Court Rules Trademark Disputes Can Be Decided Through Arbitration โš–๏ธ

Supreme Court Rules Trademark Disputes Can Be Decided Through Arbitration โš–๏ธ

๐Ÿ“˜ Introduction: In May 2025, the Supreme Court delivered a pivotal judgment holding that ...

New 2025 Rules: Why a Trademark Is Now Essential for Online Selling in India โš–๏ธ

New 2025 Rules: Why a Trademark Is Now Essential for Online Selling in India โš–๏ธ

๐Ÿ“˜ Introduction: Starting January 2025, more Indian eCommerce platforms and digital paymen...